Favorite young people MG ONE／Lynk & Co 06 chassis comparison

　　[Autohome technology] Now in this car market, it is impossible to hold consumers without "work" at all. Some models are targeting new energy, some are targeting intelligence, and some are targeting the demands of young people. What do young people want? It must be "I want it all!" In this case, in addition to working on intelligent configuration, many brands also want to make their models more and more flamboyant and personalized. For example, the two cars compared today, just this design and color scheme can see that their target customers must be young people. Since "all want", mere appearance is not enough. Let’s take a look at the level of the two cars in terms of deeper chassis.

○ Model introduction and chassis overview

　　Before talking about the chassis, let’s briefly introduce the two products. Regardless of the final conclusion of the chassis hardware, these two cars are clearly aimed at the needs of young people, and I often say that the chassis at this price is actually only one aspect of the hardware. The key depends on the adjustment and whether it suits your taste. In fact, you can basically get the answer by going to the store to experience a test drive.

　　At a price of over 100,000 yuan, buying a personalized SUV is presumably the appeal of many consumers. In addition, both cars also use a 1.5T engine and a front-drive mode, but they use a CVT stepless transmission with better theoretical smoothness, while the Lynk & Co 06 is a 7-speed wet dual-clutch transmission.

　　It looks similar. In fact, this is a showdown between SAIC’s SIGMA architecture platform and Lynk & Co’s BMA Evo architecture platform. The former has been optimized in many hard-point designs and connecting rods, while the latter has always had Volvo’s experience and technology. Let’s find out which is better and which is worse.

Front suspension structure and details

　　In the front suspension section, both cars use the McPherson-style front suspension, a simple structure evolved from the candle suspension that is particularly common in this price range, and its small footprint also fits the layout of the transverse engine platform.

　　From the perspective of the general structure and material level of the front suspension, whether it is the MG ONE from the SAIC SIGMA architecture platform or the Lynk 06 from the Lynk & Co BMA Evo architecture platform, the two cars have little difference in front suspension position, and they are also in line with the normal level of SUVs at this price.

　　From the front chassis details alone, the two models are of the same level in terms of chassis hardware. MG ONE wins in the full-frame subframe and wheel arch lining coverage area, while the lower control arm of Lynk & Co 06 has been further strengthened. Both cars belong to the mainstream level in the same class of SUVs.